Tuesday, October 15, 2013

As per the latest laws in India, women are entitled to equal share in property

As per the latest laws in India, women are entitled to equal share in property.  This has been in vogue for more than  a decade. But is that functional in the case of Indian women? As long as people don't talk about property, all brothers and sisters are the greatest chums of each other. But once division of ancestral property comes up as a part of family discussion, we see the ugly selfish minds of people against their own kith and kin. Even today there are people who think that wealth should go to the son because he performs their last rites(in most of the hindu patriarchal families). They consider the son's lineage as their own and they prefer to give him everything they have even if he is born many years after the daughter. They easily cut her off from her legitimate rights because this has precisely been the trend since age immemorial.   All these years the  hindu property laws have been biased against women. An average hindu mind is still not prepared to accept the new laws. The daughter often finds that she gets a very raw deal, even if  she has had a bad marriage. Now the trouble is that the people the lady has to deal with is her own mother, father and brother, whom she may have loved and cared for.      If  a handful of  women have had a fair deal from their parents, good for them.  But the fact is society makes things worse in many ways. The favorite topic is the marriage. Hindu marriages are mostly conducted by the girl's parents. The boy's parents may want a "grand" marriage. The girl's parents tell them that if the marriage is simple and the expenses are nominal, then they would give her a flat. But they are made to spend damn heavily on the marriage, then they would not give equal property share for the girl but just a  few thousands as gift vouchers. She can't ask for property thereafter.  All this discussion takes place in the absence of the girl, who is supposed to feel shy and stay in her room. So the girl's father and boy's father decide that the marriage ceremony should be grandly performed, with all costly paraphernaila hired and heavy sarees and jewels for relatives.  Let us not talk about property now. The girl's father can do whatever he wants with the property. Well, why should the boy's parents be worried about what the girl gets?  They apparently don't mind sacrificing the girl's interest for a few happy moments for themselves.After the marriage and a couple of years, the divison of the property takes place. The father and the brothers of the girl, keep her off. They tell her that all the property share she deserved was already spent on the marriage expense and dowry of the girl. Earlier the girl may not have been given a professional education because her parents at that time might have thought that  this is after all a girl. Since her marriage expense is there before them in future, why spend on her education?  Again when   the property share is broached,they quote the  same marriage expense. When the marriage expenses were taken care of  mainly under the insistence of "her people" (who??? The husband's parents are now referred to her as "her people" ),  ahemm... so as her people had asked for it, what makes her ask for equal proprety share? So the daughter gets nothing. She is treated as if she simply doesn't exist. Now who decides the marriage expense and at the cost of whom? The net result is that the girl is deprived of  her share for no fault of hers.         I don't speak of "smart" girls who are such clever Gonerils and Regans  that they manipulate their parents and see to it that they get a major share of property. Other than an equal  fair share, they claim the entire heap of the mother's jewels too, as a token of affection.  But there are women who may have had   a comparitively poor education, a bad marriage and yet a bad property deal doled out by her own parents.  When it is the father's  self earned property, it is easy for him to say "It is not necessary for me  to give you anything.... it is my money and it should  go to my  son". Now this is a very delicate issue that can complicate things. She may agree, she does but feel hurt. The relationship sours and she decides never to turn to her parents any more. When the question of taking care of parents come, these days parents do depend a lot on their daughters. It is  so mercenery to neglect responsibility for not having got a share, so she goes out of her way to help them in many ways.        Even other wise, an average woman is scared to ask anything by way of share because her  brothers promptly  allege that her husband is demanding dowry  through her by clandestine means, brainwashing her innocent mind. Something that  may be false and wholly untrue. The husband may keep out of this completely. Yet, relationships get bitter when her husband is dragged into this unnecessarily and accused of what he does not even intend. It breaks family ties and daughters become permanent enemies of their own parents.    The tricky aspect of all this is that every problem cannot be solved be law. There  may be gentle hearted girls, who willingly forgo what is rightfully theirs because their brains get twisted by dowry issue. If the husband opens his mouth, specially when the father in law is propertied, she begins to suspect that her own husband of demanding dowry. Things  get complex when an unsuspecting mother in law makes a request to the girl's parents to gift a certain jewel, small trinkets like a half a soverign gold ring or a tiny vessel that  any one can afford for the birth of a child.  This gets featured in the family discussion as "demand for dowry. "At school level and college level we violently attack dowry system and call it an evil and so on. But in real life things could be so deviantly interpreted to the disadvantage of daughters. Educated hindus bash dowry system so much that the daughters are expected to stay silent and take anything that is offered. Sometimes it is so painful to see the way parents jealously safeguard the interests of  the son. Property share is confused with dowry issues and marriage expenses in such a clever manner that the daughter is finally kept out of family property. Finally all you really get is what you earn by the sweat of your brow. Family property goes to the  male, thank you. If any thing is demanded by the daughter or offered to the daughter, may she be hanged for desiring "dowry".Phew! When is Indian Legal system going to define  dowry and property share in  more clear, distinct  terms to protect the lady's interests? Or the least, what advice would you like to give so that every body gets a fair share with out filial bonds getting upset?

No comments:

Post a Comment