Crime Against Men
|
|
Crime Bure data,
In
the Year 2005, the Crime Against Men, More than Twenty-two Lacks sixty Four
Thousands ( 92.88%) vs One Lack fifty-five thousands against women(
6.38%)?
Crime against
Men :
22 ,64 , 445/-
In the Year 2005 the
Crime Against Men, More than Twenty-two Lacks sixty Four Thousands vs One
Lack fifty-five thousands against women?
% Wise All
India Crime Against Men, Woemn and Child as Under :
Crime Against
Women :
6.38%
Crime Against
Child
: 0.73%
Crime Against
Men
: 92.88%
We wonder Whose life
is in More Danger in India : Men or Women?
Crime Bure data 2005 : Married Men Sucide : 52k
vs Married Women Sucide 28K.Still there is no LAW to Protect Men why?
Will Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B( dowry death) to 304C( Sowry
Death) and 498A ( harrasement to wife) to 498B ( Sowry harrasement by
wife)
No. of Person Arrested under (498A
+304B)
: 161217
Child/Senior citizen/Women
arrested
:280/4700/31253
No. Of person Arrested Under 304B
: 24562
No. of Person Arrested Only under 498A (living
women) : 137180
No. Of person Not Charge
sheeted
: 31128
No. Of person Charge Sheeted
: 125277
No. Of person's Trial
Completed
: 78292
No. Of person convicted
(498A+304B)
: 16995
No. Of Person Convicted by 304B
: 5144
No. Of person Convicted Under 498A but not
304B
: NA?
No. Of person Proved Innocence at Court under
498A : 61297
No. Person's case compunded or
withdrawn
: 13970
No. Of person Convicted only under 498A
without 304B : NA ?
No. Of person Accused under 498A and
harresed to Got AB/ArrestStay and Trail not recomended, at least 5 times
more 8,05,000 : NA ? ( 8,05,000 )
On an average (3+19.3) = 22.3% people's case (4812+31128)
=35,940/- had not been even charge sheeted and proved innocence before
trail.
It is a clear example that approx 80% cases
people proved their innocence at Court that they had been arrested without
any reason/evidence as 498A/304B is non-bailable and do not need any
evidence to arrest any TOM/Dick or Marry .
So, it is a clear example that more than 92.3%
cases the people had been arrested under 498A without any evidence, where as
if the case is true and the verbal statement of the compliment itself find
true, the convection is 100%.
Still in this special LAW more than 92.3%
People proved their innocence, where as in normal IPC the convection is more
than such LAW, then why need this special LAW?
The Answer : To do the Legal Terrorism and
earn the money from Husband's Family as a whole sale free license and
openly Blackmail and do the extortion of money by Wives family in front of
Police/Court/Media and the same is not to be termed as crime.
We wonder Whose life
is in More Danger in India : Men or Women?
To understand the
reason one must Know: Women "Engineering viewpoint"
About 1650 Husbands aged between 15-49 years and
selected through random sampling were interviewed using a schedule adapted
from the WHO multi-country study on Husband's health and domestic violence.
The study looked at all four aspects of domestic violence — Economical,emotional, physical and sexual. Economical violence was found to be the commonest with 32.8% respondents saying they had faced it at least once,followed by emotional (22.2%) , by physical (25.2%) and sexual violence (19.8%). An interesting finding was that the probability of violence increased significantly with the duration of marriage particularly if it was more than seven years old. But, says Dr J K Grover, one of the researchers,
Every married man is
a victim of domestic violence. Since verbal abuse, emotional abuse and mental
cruelty is a form of domestic violence, men can reasonably prove that each
and every married man is a victim of domestic violence.
How often are we nagged by our wife? Almost
every single day.
The nagging of your wife is so incredibly
powerful that you will do anything to avoid being on the receiving end. You
will begin to obey all her instructions only to protect yourself from her
nagging. Her words go cracking down your spine leaving you frustrated,
depressed and helpless. You feel that by crying your wife will calm down but
you are wrong. She will get more angry and when she proves her point making
you accept her wrong notions, she will cry in front of others complaining
about you. This is a very old-fashioned tactic but it still works wonders for
women. First harass the husband, and when she is successful in bring him down
to his knees, she will complain about him to others with tears in her eyes.
Is this what they call domestic violence on women? It's a shame that the
society believes the lies of these women. It is easy to laugh on these
harassed husbands and many do laugh on them. People prefer to support abusive
wives posing as a victim but they will not support genuinely harassed
husbands.
Husbands are not reluctant to say that they
fear their wife, and the society, instead of sympathizing, make them a
laughing stock. The society treats harassed husbands as those lots who are
not man enough, who can't control their wives, and who will be their wife's
slave. Society finds it funny. If a harassed husband complains, he will be
ridiculed and humiliated for being a victim in the hands of his wife. If the
husband says that he has to first ask her wife before taking a decision, the
society will ridicule him for not able to take a decision on his own. And
when he does take the decision on his own, the same society will insult him
for harassing and disrespecting his wife. The society is also responsible for
making the lives of harassed husbands more miserable. Here, in the house, the
wife is taking all the decisions and giving the ultimatum to his husband to
keep his mouth shut, and other women are complaining of not been treated
equally in the house in decision making. What a deception!!!
Husbands are not free in their own house.
The wife will always be watchful what her husband is doing or planning to do.
She will inquire about everything, absolutely everything - from using a new
shaving cream to his female colleague's dress. She will ask trick questions
to trap the husband to make him say that he looked at another woman, and then
the husband will be punished for a week by boycotting him in the house. He
will be dragged in discussing issues that are useless and trivial, and if the
husband expresses his dislike to discuss on such issues, then again the wife
will make him feel guilty of neglecting her, which will continue for weeks.
In every situation, the husband is made to feel that he is always wrong and
the wife is always right. The moment the husband comes home from office, the
wife is mentally ready to show him who is the real boss in the house. She
will ask him about the day making him feel that he is in safe hands, and then
bang, the wife strikes him with a vicious blow of her taunts, criticizing his
this habits, that habits, this attitude and that attitude. He is tired from
work and he is subjected to such mental cruelty every day.
If the husband happens to say something that
has irritated the wife then she will make sure that the husband knows that he
is now going to get a rough treatment. She will bang kitchen utensils, break
glasses, she will throw things to make noise and she will steal the
television remote control, go into her room and shut the door. At times she
will even physically assault her husband with a slap or a kick on his groin.
The husband can easily fight back and send her to hospital but he endures all
pain silently. The husband knows that he has to kneel down and apologize even
when it was not his fault. After all, the society has taught him to
compromise with his abusive wife in all circumstances. The husband has to
adjust himself with the extreme behaviour of his wife, her tantrums, vicious
taunts, silent treatment and boycotting. Such cruel treatment on the husband
on a daily basis is indeed a severe form of domestic violence. But the
society has accepted that domestic violence on husband is part and parcel of
married life for all men. Even if a man complains, there are plenty of people
pretending to be wiser in marriage, advising him to tolerate it silently.
"Its all life, you got to accept it," they would say. And when a
woman complains to the society, these same people would say, "don't
tolerate, go and complain to the police station." This double standard
of the society cannot be forgiven.
The life of a man gets ruined because his
wife has murdered his individuality. His wife has strangulated his freedom of
speech. His wife has tortured his independence. His wife has subjected him to
mental cruelty to such an extent that in the husband's heart of heart, he
just wishes to die as soon as possible. He works all day to earn for his
family, he lives like a slave in his house, and hear news that all men are
wife-beaters. Deception of feminists is spreading far and wide. Feminists
have no words for husband-beaters. A wife humiliates his husband saying that
he failed to sexually satisfy her and she wants to satisfy herself from
outside men. The husband is emotionally shattered to hear that but he knows
he can't stop her nor can he complain. The wife enjoys her sex life with
other men and the husband continues to helplessly sponsor the life of this
husband-beater. And if the husband is too tired to have sex, the wife will
humiliate him for days calling him impotent. Such emotional abuse is
considered funny by the society.
The society has never accepted the reality
about how much love is there in the heart of the father for his children. The
father's sacrifice for his children is never recognized. The children will
grow up being brainwashed by the mother thinking that their father is
useless, stupid and deserve to be beaten up by their mother. The wife will
never allow the father to talk to their children alone because she does not
want the children to support their father. The children often turn against
their fathers on one command of the wife. And if the father has two or three
daughters than he accepts that he must have committed a lot of sin in some
past births. His whole existences in the house will be humiliated and
tortured by females in the house. In many cases, the wife persuades the
daughter to file a false rape case on the father to teach him a lesson. The
father's life is ruined and spends the rest of his life in jail just because
his wife thought this is what her husband deserves.
What if men realize that they do have a
'choice'? Since women who are husband-beaters are also posing as victims of
domestic violence, then why would a man not complain against his abusive
wife?
Each and every married man is a victim of
domestic violence. He is a victim of nagging, emotional abuse, blackmail,
physical abuse, sexual abuse, and mental cruelty. Are men going to continue
treating this torture as part and parcel of their married life or will they
seek justice and equality? Amazingly, many people are encouraging these
harassed husbands to speak up against this cruelty but they seem to be so
scared of their wife that they would probably remain a harassed husband in
the hands of their abusive wife till they die. For now, those abusive wives
are enjoying themselves torturing their husbands and also posing as a victim
for the society to think that all husbands are wife-beaters. Who could be a
bigger liar than these women?
This is a Report
based on 5 years Research and Study on dowry Prohibition act, its use and misuse.This
Reasearch conducted by our own Experts of MyNation for
Save Indian Society,and not funded by any gender biased organisations. We
studied 1500 Plus Families, these are feed backs from them and from the
reports published by media.
Out of 100 cases that are ordered for investigation
under 498A, only in 2 cases the accused get convicted.
98% misuse is
"okay" says Minister Renuka chowdrey
Even there is 98%
misuse, why not there is any change?
Because it is not only against husband but his whole Family. The Western funded Supporter of this law, determined to ruin Family system of India and sabotage Indian Society.
For centuries in
India women were treated like goddesses – or devis. Even though
there was sati (suttee), with widows voluntary taking
to and immolating themselves on their late husband’s funeral pyre, as devout
Hindus believe, or forced to do so, as opponents of satibelieve,
it was purely a religious custom, that had nothing to do with women
rights. Man was the head of the family, but at home in fact he was his
wife’s puppet, a situation described by the wry aside: “He is the BOSS
of the House – he has his wife’s permission to say so!”
Real Statistics on Domestic violence:
One of the most pervasive myths of our
society is that domestic violence is something men do to women. Solid
scientific research reveals that domestic violence is something women do to
men more frequently than men do to women.
While it is true that men account for most
violence outside the home, women instigate most domestic violence and they
injure men more frequently and more severely.
The Family Research Laboratory at the
University of New Hampshire, under grants from the National Institute of
Mental Health, recently finished the last of three national studies on
domestic violence. The first two studies revealed results similar to the
latest study. Anyone who would like a copy of it may order it from the
University of New Hampshire (ask for Document V55). The data tape and
documentation of the 1975 and 1985 studies are available from the
Interuniversity Consortium For Political and Social Research at the
University of Michingan.
Original data is also available on CD-ROM
from Sociometrics, Inc. in Palo Alto, CA.
The average results in the 'severe assault'
category are reported below:
* Wives report they have been severely
assaulted by husband 22 per 1000
* Wives report they have severely assaulted
husband 59 per 1000
* Husbands report they have been severely
assaulted by wives 32 per 1000
* Husbands report they have severely
assaulted wives 18 per 1000
* Husbands & wives both report wife has
been assaulted 20 per 1000
* Husbands & wives both report husband
has been assaulted 44 per 1000
There are dozens of other studies that
reveal similar findings. For instance:
Marital Rape – A sabotage of Institute of
Marriage: Study Report
If wife enjoys at night and next morning she will charge husband with marital rape; then how to judge between sex and rape ?
Who will decide how
much sex is not rape ?
For Indian women sex is a bargaining tool to
get things done from husband; if she withhold sex for no reason; when her
desire is not fulfilled by husband, what husband has to do. In this situation
man will not get Divorce as per biased Indian judiciary. And she cann`t be
charged under breach of trust either. AS per TOI 10/09/07, 312, indian commit
suicide everyday, Now you know why men commit suicide
As per constitute of India, in the eyes of
Indian judiciary all citizens are equal and there is no difference in gender
caste or colour, then why this bias, why this step mother policy or
partiality. Or its mockery of constitute. But i`m sure its sabotage of
Institute of marriage and hidden agenda of women organizations to break
family system.
Authors : Rudolph
Dsouza / Amitabh Dasgupta
Stiffer dowry law
may lead to more abuse: Times News
Stiffer dowry law may lead to more abuse: Times
News
NEW DELHI: However
well-intentioned, the recommendations made by National Commission for Women
(NCW) to make the dowry law more stringent are fraught with the risk of
further abuse. The commission's failure to come up with any proposal to check
frivolous or false allegations of dowry harassment under Section 498A IPC
flies in the face of repeated attempts by the judiciary to flag the
legislature's attention.
Supreme Court, while upholding the constitutionality of Section 498A in 2005 in Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union of India, conceded that "many instances have come to light" where the complaints of dowry harassment were found to be "not bona fide and have been filed with an oblique motive." Cautioning that the misuse of the provision could result in a "new legal terrorism" for the affected husbands and their families, SC said the tendency of crying wolf could prove counterproductive to women too as "protection may not be available when the actual wolf appears." The bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat said it might "become necessary for the legislature" to find new ways of reducing the susceptibility of Section 498A to abuse. Since the legislature has so far shown no sign of heeding SC's call for reforming the dowry law, the Delhi high court raised eyebrows two months ago by making a rather sweeping declaration that Section 498A was being used "to convert failed marriages into a crime and people are using this as a tool to extract as much monetary benefit as possible." NCW's preference to maintain the status quo in this regard also disregards the specific proposal made by the Justice Malimath committee in 2003 that Section 498A be made bailable and compoundable to give a chance to the spouses to come together. Much as it drew flak for seeking to render the provision toothless, the Malimath recommendation could have have been finetuned to deal with the vexed issue. The lopsided approach adopted by NCW is evident from its proposal of enhancing the minimum punishment for "dowry death" under Section 304B from seven years to 10 years. From a moral view point, it might well seem tenable to treat dowry death at par with the more serious offence of "culpable homicide not amounting to murder" committed with "the intention of causing death or of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death." But NCW failed to take into account that dowry death carries lesser penalty because of the low bar of evidence required to secure conviction under Section 304B, which contains a presumption of guilt against the accused for causing the death if the wife dies in unnatural circumstances within seven years of the marriage. As a result, NCW's recommendation to increase the presumtion period from seven years to the entire lifetime may only end up prolonging the scope for abuse.
Any LAW should be
crime based and without any assumption of gender biased that all the Husbands
Born in Criminal family and all the Wives born in Raja Harish Chandra Family
(Never lie). If women die, men also die in un-natural death and as
per crime Bure, it is more than 52000 married men ending their life every
year compared to 28000 married women.
But when a women die,
we want to punish without any evidence , not only men, his mother/sister
also , but when men die we called it is social service by a women,
even the wife burnt alive the husband got Scot free, Movie Provoke, is the
wittness.
Already murder law are there to take care if any one kill their Wife… what for?
Ohh.. Forget in so
called dowry law, no evidence required to send any tom/dick/Harry or Marry
behind the bar and do the legal terrorism and that is the reason NCW want to
punish the people without any evidence. It is not the dowry death increased,
it is the false fabricated dowry death case increased.
Women organizations are specially engaged to
all City Hospital( with the huge fund they get form Government as well as
outside country) and whenever any wife come their due to any Un-natural death
, the same to be termed as Dowry death , let it be accident/suicide or other
illness. Where as more than 52000 Married men are ending their
life every year, but there is No Men well fare ministry at all in this
country, forget about any protection LAW.
In the Year 2005, the Crime Against Men, More than Twenty-two Lacks sixty Four Thousands (92.88%) vs One Lack fifty-five thousands against women (6.38%). Comp. Sue Moto By Police(FIR Registered): 24,37,973/- Crime Against Women : 1,55,553/- Crime against Child : 17,975/- Crime against Men : 22 ,64 , 445/- In the Year 2005 the Crime Against Men, More than Twenty-two Lacks sixty Four Thousands vs One Lack fifty-five thousands against women? % Wise All India Crime Against Men, Women and Child as Under : Crime Against Women : 6.38% Crime Against Child : 0.73% Crime Against Men : 92.88% We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India : Men or Women? To understand the reason one must know: Women "Engineering viewpoint"
Crime Bure data 2005:
Married Men Suicide: 52000 vs Married Women Suicide 28000.Still there is no
LAW to Protect Men why?
Will Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B (dowry death) to 304C ( Sowry Death) and 498A ( harassment to wife) to 498B ( Sowry harassment by wife) . (Crime Is Crime. Punishment should be irrespective of gender, religion and caste. Let us be honest and fight for truth)
A failed marriage is
not a crime however, the provisions of Section 498A are being used to convert
failed marriages into a crime and the people are using this as tool to
extract as much monetary benefit as possible.
In many cases, where FIRs are filed under Section 498A IPC, petitions are being filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIRs after settlements between the parties and the allegations made of cruelties etc. are withdrawn the moment a lump sum payment is received. Involving each of the family members of the husband is another arm in the armory of the complainants of failed marriages. Not only close relatives but distant relatives and even neighbours are being implicated under Section 498A and other provisions of IPC in cases of failed marriages. The Courts must be very cautious during trials of such offences. In all these cases in the name of investigation, except recording statement of complainant and her few relatives nothing is done by police. The police does not verify any circumstantial evidence nor collect any other evidence about the claims made by the complainant. No evidence about giving of dowry or resources of the complainant's family claiming spending of huge amounts is collected by the police. This all is resulting into gross misuse of the provisions of law. The investigating agency in all such cases must collect all circumstantial and other evidence in respect of claims made by the complainant and similarly Courts should always be careful in considering the credibility and truthfulness of the statement of the complainant and relatives. |
